##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

John Brunero

Abstract

Conor McHugh and Jonathan Way have defended a view of good reasoning according to which good reasoning is explained in terms of the preservation of fittingness.  I argue that their Fittingness View is incorrect.  Not all fittingness-preserving transitions in thought are instances of good reasoning. 

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Discussion Notes